Olaf Scholz allies in revolt against German leader and Brussels over new hated tax laws

Olaf Scholz is sworn in as Germany's new chancellor

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

German Green Federal Environment Minister Lemke has announced a “clear no” to the plans from Brussels to classify nuclear power as sustainable and therefore worthy of funding. In a move that is already splitting the new government in Berlin, the Green politician said on ARD television that the federal government would finalise its statement in the next few days and transmit it to the EU Commission.

The negative stance therein is represented by the Ampel coalition “closed”.

It would then be up to the Commission to decide how to proceed, not only from Germany, despite the clear voices against nuclear power.

The federal government or the EU parliament alone would not have the power to completely reverse their decision.

The Brussels executive had sent a proposal for the so-called taxonomy regulation to the EU member states on New Year’s Eve.

Among other things, it wants to classify investments in new nuclear power plants as climate-friendly under certain circumstances.

The Commission said on Monday it has delayed to later this month the deadline for experts to give feedback on divisive plans to allow some natural gas and nuclear energy projects to be labelled as sustainable investments.

The Commission drafted a plan late last year to add some gas and nuclear investments to the European Union’s “taxonomy,” its rule book to define which investments can be labelled as climate-friendly in the EU.

Brussels said on Monday its expert advisers will have until January 21 to provide feedback on the draft proposal, rather than until January 12 as initially planned.

“The deadline has been postponed by a week and the reason is basically to give a bit more time to the platform to provide its views,” European Commission Chief Spokesperson Eric Mamer told a news briefing, referring to the “platform” of advisers from industry, NGOs and the finance sector.

READ MORE: European Parliament President dies after ‘serious’ health complication

The Commission shared the draft with its advisers late on New Year’s Eve, setting a deadline that campaigners said was too short and limited scrutiny of the rules – suggestions rejected by the EU’s executive.

The draft – which was leaked to some media organisations – has reignited disputes between EU countries, which disagree on whether gas and nuclear are green.

Spain, Germany and Austria’s governments are among those to publicly criticise the latest proposal.

Once the EU’s advisers give their feedback, Brussels will publish its final proposal.

DON’T MISS:
Channel migrant row explodes as France to push for EU-UK treaty [REACTION]
Brexit: British trade spikes with 822% import surge [LIVE BLOG]
Huge win as new sea route bypassing EU mainland ‘up and running’ [INSIGHT]

A super-majority of EU countries or the European Parliament could block it in the four months that follow.

If they do not, the rules would enter into force.

The long-awaited taxonomy is part of EU plans to mobilise massive low-carbon investments to meet its goal to have net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

Using detailed criteria that each “green” investment must meet – such as emissions limits or energy efficiency – the taxonomy aims to make climate-friendly projects more visible and attractive to private capital, and stop organisations from overstating their environmental credentials.

Source: Read Full Article