Meghan Markle says ‘damage runs deep’ in emotional response to privacy claim win

Meghan Markle released an emotional statement on Thursday after a privacy case against Associated Newspapers ruled in her favour.

The Duchess of Sussex took legal action over Associated Newspapers – which owns the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday – for the Mail on Sunday's publication of parts of a private letter she wrote to her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018.

In a statement shared with HuffPost, she said: "After two long years of pursuing litigation, I am grateful to the courts for holding Associated Newspapers and The Mail on Sunday to account for their illegal and dehumanizing practices."

“These tactics (and those of their sister publications MailOnline and the Daily Mail) are not new; in fact, they’ve been going on for far too long without consequence,” the royal added.

“For these outlets, it’s a game. For me and so many others, it’s real life, real relationships, and very real sadness. The damage they have done and continue to do runs deep.”

She said that while “the world needs reliable, fact-checked, high-quality news,” the tabloid’s work is “the opposite” of that. 

“We all lose when misinformation sells more than truth, when moral exploitation sells more than decency, and when companies create their business model to profit from people’s pain,” she continued.

  • Romantic way Prince William and Kate Middleton celebrate Valentine's Day

The Duchess of Sussex thanked her husband, Prince Harry, her mother Doria Ragland as well as her legal team.

“I share this victory with each of you,” the royal added.

"Because we all deserve justice and truth, and we all deserve better.”

Judge Sir Mark Warby, said Meghan had a "reasonable expectation" that the letter she wrote to her father would remain private and the subsequent articles published by the Mail in 2019, "interfered with that reasonable expectation."

  • Meghan Markle and Harry 'can't understand why they're less important than Will and Kate'

“It was, in short, a personal and private letter,” he wrote.

“The majority of what was published was about the claimant’s own behaviour, her feelings of anguish about her father’s behaviour – as she saw it – and the resulting rift… These are inherently private and personal matters.”

After the ruling, a spokesperson for Associated Newspapers said: “We are very surprised by today’s summary judgment and disappointed at being denied the chance to have all the evidence heard and tested in open court at a full trial. We are carefully considering the judgment’s contents and will decide in due course whether to lodge an appeal.”

Warby will convene a hearing on March 2 to discuss costs with both parties.

Source: Read Full Article