Ruth Bader Ginsburg successor: Who will replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court?

We will use your email address only for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for details of your data protection rights.

Aside from being incredibly sad for all those who loved and admired Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Justice’s death has set in motion a monumental political battle in the lead up to the November 3 presidential election in the US. As tributes for Ms Bader Ginsburg poured in, it soon became apparent she had not held back on her views of what the future might hold for her seat, one of the most important judicial positions in the US. Justice Bader Ginsburg made one last request before her death, stating: “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”

Who will replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court?

Donald Trump will name his third nominee for Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on Friday or Saturday.

Memorials for the deceased Justice will take place on Wednesday and Thursday, where her body will lie in state at the Supreme Court.

Justice Bader Ginsburg’s coffin will lie on the Lincoln Catafalque, a platform built after President Abraham Lincoln’s assassination in 1865.

Speaking to Fox News in a phone interview, President Trump said: “I think it will be on Friday or Saturday and we want to pay respect.

“It looks like we will have services on Thursday or Friday, as I understand it, and I think we should, with all due respect for Justice Ginsburg, wait for services to be over.”

According to ABC News, the current favourite to take over from Ms Bader Ginsburg is US Circuit Judge Amy Coney Barrett, 48.

Ms Coney Barrett is a devout Catholic and holds pro-life views – a stark contrast to the famously liberal and pro-women views of Justice Ginsburg.

Judge Coney Barrett was already a finalist for the last Supreme Court nomination in 2018, but was beaten by Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Among the others on President Trump’s list are Senator Ted Cruz, Trump’s closest competition for the Republican presidency nomination in 2016; Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas; and Department of Justice official Stephen Engel.

The death of Ms Bader Ginsburg has sparked fear in liberals all over the country, with increasing concern Mr Trump will replace her seat with a conservative justice.

If this were to happen, several aspects of life under American law could change, including women’s rights to an abortion – a hotly discussed topic for decades.

The election of a conservative judge to the highest court in America would also decisively tilt the ideological balance of the court for a generation, and would be themes lasting legacy of the Trump presidency.

DON’T MISS
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Why is RBG so important to the US Senate? [EXPLAINED]
Meghan Markle issues emotional tribute to Ruth Bader Ginsburg  [INSIGHT]
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Donald Trump called for Justice to resign [ANALYSIS]

Reproductive rights, voting rights, protections from discrimination, the future of criminal justice, the power of the presidency, the rights of immigrants, tax rules and laws, and healthcare for millions of vulnerable Americans are just a few of the issues at stake.

An ideological tilt of this kind on the Supreme Court has not been seen for 50 years.

The leading candidate, Judge Coney Barrett, concerns more progressive politicians with her devout Roman Catholic faith and conservative views on a number of social issues.

At Ms Coney Barrett’s circuit court confirmation hearings, the Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein expressed concern the judge would be guided by church law instead of the constitution.

Ms Feinstein said: “The dogma lives loudly within you and that is a concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for years in this country.”

However, it is not entirely sure Mr Trump will manage to get his nominee to the Supreme Court.

Any new appointment by the President has to be confirmed in a straight majority by the Senate.

Senate leader Mitch McConnell has said he would confirm a new justice before the election.

But Mr McConnell is working with a very narrow 53 to 47 majority, and if Mr Trump nominates a conservative with extreme views, confirmation may be more difficult.

Source: Read Full Article